[WSIS CS-Plenary] WSIS 3, why not ?
Paul Wilson
pwilson at apnic.net
Wed Dec 7 00:46:11 GMT 2005
On the other hand, as many have asked, what was the total global cost of
WSIS, and what could have been achieved if all those costs were dedicated
to the addressing the digital divide rather than talking about it.
I'm not against talking, in fact I enjoy it very much, but let's subject
this particular talkfest to a cost-benefit analysis before launching into
another one.
Paul Wilson
--On Wednesday, 7 December 2005 12:37 AM +0100 Marouen MRAIHI
<mr.marouen at gmail.com> wrote:
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire
> list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific
> people]
>
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation
> of this message! _______________________________________
>
> I know that many will delete this email without reading it thanks to
> the subject. :-)
>
> Well, I know that the proposal wasn't accepted but do we need the
> ITU/UN to organise it ?
> What I liked more in the WSIS, like many of the participants, the
> opportunity of partnerships, of meeting people, of experiences
> exchange, of workshops and trainings, networking ...
> So organizing a "fellow-up" like event in 2010 should not be so
> impossible.
>
> Regards
>
> Marouen
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
More information about the Plenary
mailing list