[WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: PCT and WGIG

[MJ Ray]

I am disappointed that there have been no answers to 
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/public/plenary/2005-January/004313.html

Particularly, it seems no-one is willing to clarify either the 
selection or competence of WGIG CS members, nor how the workingmethods 
"majority rule" drive can fit in a consensus-based decision-making 
system. I guess it's fine by this list if society views WGIG as having 
no legitimate civil society involvement?

The short review deadlines reinforce that sentiment, as does the 
neglect of basic accessibilty guidelines and best practice.

The reply given to Philipp Budka in 
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/public/plenary/2005-January/004395.html 
makes me wonder about the legitimacy of WSIS, even. What is this 
accreditation process and where are details on the www.wsis-cs.org 
site? Do all the non-NGO actors of civil society have to be approved 
by the NGOs?


Finally, I ask the author of 
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/public/plenary/2005-January/004314.html 
- who is "Rony Koven"? They don't even have a nickname. (I'm sorry for 
missing my homepage URL off of a couple of messages, but it's old and 
not really essential for the questions.)

-- 
MJR/slef    My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
Please cc on replies - address has changed