[WSIS CS-Plenary] Liberation/Francia: l'accord
Microsoft-UNESCO - English translation
veni markovski
veni at veni.com
Thu Jan 6 03:10:34 GMT 2005
At 15:42 05-01-2005 -0500, Robert Guerra wrote:
>UNDP signed the agreement at the WSIS summit - and wasn't caught by many
>until months after. That we are reacting quicker to the UNESCO development
>is good, but too late?
Actually it was caught the very day of the meeting, back in December 2003.
By the IHT and the New York Times. It's interesting the announcement was
made exactly when Microsoft was under attack:)
Open-source software gets boost at UN
by Jennifer L. Schenker IHT
http://www.iht.com/articles/121033.html
Geneva
A months-long backroom battle led by Brazil, with support from India, South
Africa and China, against the United States over open-source software took
center stage Wednesday at the UN information summit meeting here.
Samuel Guimar es, executive secretary in Brazil's foreign ministry, told
government representatives at the summit meeting's opening sessions that
free-to-share software is crucial for the developing world because it
enables poorer countries to develop their own technology instead of having
to import it.
That message put the maneuvering for open-source software business at the
highest levels of global policy, with proponents and critics both
struggling for the endorsement of intra-governmental agencies such as the UN.
Brazil wanted the summit talks to endorse the idea that the digital divide
cannot be bridged with proprietary software and that open-source software,
which is developed collaboratively and exchanged freely over the Internet,
is the best path forward.
The language was watered down considerably in the summit meeting's written
declaration after pressure from developed countries, according to
participants, but the free software did get a mention as an important
option for developing countries to consider.
"Companies that sell proprietary software are going to have to accept that
there is competition and that is good for developing countries because it
leads to affordable pricing and increased access," said Raoul Zambrano, a
UN adviser on information and communication technologies, in an interview.
The information and communications technology arm of the UN Development
Program is currently advising governments that ask on how to use open
source as a tool to build local skills. But Zambrano said the UNDP is
cautioning them not to mandate open source for their governments because
that creates another type of monopoly. The goal, he said, is to create
choice and competition.
The UNDP plans to announce that it will open a regional center in Europe to
help governments in the Balkans and Baltics move to open-source software.
The debate over commercial software such as Microsoft's dominant operating
system, Windows, and collaborative software has become a rich versus poor
argument at the UN meeting, which is trying to address how to close the
digital divide.
Veni Markovski, head of the Bulgarian president's information technology
advisory council and head of the local branch of the Internet Society, said
he had approached the UNDP to get help for his country and was motivated to
do so because he was shocked by the outcome of several government contracts
involving Microsoft products.
In the first case, the government spent $13.6 million on Microsoft's
Windows XP products in 2002. He claimed that it was later discovered that
the government paid twice the list price for the software, which was
purchased through a Microsoft retailer.
A Microsoft spokeswoman and another member of the Bulgarian delegation at
the UN talks, Roman Trifonov, denied that the government had overpaid for
the software,
Another contract, involving a contract for an e-government portal on the
Internet, which would allow citizens to access government services online,
required citizens to use Windows XP or Windows 2000 and to use Internet
Explorer as their browser, Markovski said.
Trifonov, an adviser to the minister of state administration, countered
that any computer user with certain system tools could access the portal.
A third contract, for $1.5 million, was for 35,000 software licenses for
schools, but Markovski maintains that there are no more than 850 computers
in schools that could run the software.
A Microsoft spokeswoman said the contract was jointly issued by the
Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and that it covers up to
15,000 computers for public schools, with the rest being used by
universities and the Academy of Science.
"I am convinced that the end result of the influence that Microsoft has on
the government here is that the end user, the citizen, doesn't have a
choice and the government doesn't have a choice," Markovski said.
Microsoft confirmed Wednesday that it was in talks with the UNDP about "how
to leverage each others' competencies." The software giant, which has said
it will invest $1 billion on helping to bridge the digital divide, said
that it did not require its software be used when the company participates
in such a project. "People at the end of the day have the right to choose
and we support that," the spokeswoman said. "It is a tough call for a lot
of agencies and groups when Microsoft offers to give away software to
schools and governments," said Peter Dravis, an independent consultant who
wrote a report about open-source software for the World Bank. But he said
there was strong bottom-up demand for open-source software, so even a
handful of Microsoft deals with governments would not ensure market dominance.
International Herald Tribune
>In regards to IDRC, do we know if any other "agreements" have been signed
>between M$ and other development agencies? If so, it would be an -
>expected - political move by M$ to stop the success of open source
>software deployment.
>
>regards
>
>Robert
>
>
>At 5:27 PM -0200 1/5/05, Carlos Afonso wrote:
>>Unesco remains totally silent regarding critiques or requests for
>>clarification on this agreement. By the way, UNDP and IDRC have signed
>>similar agreements with M$. Ah, the power of money...
>>
>>--c.a.
>
>--
>###
>Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
>Privaterra - <http://www.privaterra.org>
>_______________________________________________
>Plenary mailing list
>Plenary at wsis-cs.org
>http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
More information about the Plenary
mailing list