[WSIS CS-Plenary] UN at odds over internet's future

[Jacqueline Morris]

Interesting - as a member of the WGIG I thought that group consensus
since February on providing multiple options in the report to the
Prepcom to negotiate with was reaching an agreement.... obviously I
misunderstood the meaning of the word "agreement"! Seems the only
meaning for "agreement" is to have only one option available.
Jacqueline Morris

On 7/18/05, Robert Guerra <rguerra at lists.privaterra.org> wrote:
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
> _______________________________________
> 
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4692743.stm
> 
> A UN group charged with deciding how the net should be run has failed
> to reach a decision.
> The group's report suggests four possible futures for net governance
> that range from no change to complete overhaul.
> The proposals will go forward to a key UN net and society conference
> due to take place in November.
> 
> The report comes as the US says it plans to keep its role as overseer
> of the net's core administrative body.
> 
> [snipped]
> 
> --
> Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
> 


-- 
______________________
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online