[WSIS CS-Plenary] UN at odds over internet's future

[Jean-Louis FULLSACK]

Dear Bertrand
I want you just to tell us your understanding about this "positive outcome". 
I wonder if a large part of the CS considers the WGIG outcomes as really positive, at least at its current state.
BTW : I'll attend the WGIG "open meeting" scheduled to-morrow morning at Palais des Nations and hope to see you.
Friendly
Jean-Louis Fullsack
CSDPTT.
 




> Message du 19/07/05 16:34
> De : "Bertrand de La Chapelle" 
> A : plenary at wsis-cs.org
> Copie à : 
> Objet : Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] UN at odds over internet's future
> 
> 
The other approach from the press is basically the UN versus US battle.

Unfortunately this only reflects the fact that the group did not devote attention to the framing of its public presentation but left the press to define its own understanding from the document itself. No doubt they went to the simplistic presentation. 

I'm afraid the opportunity has been missed to emphqsize the originality of the group, the approach it took and how it considers its report as a positive outcome.

Bertrand
> 
>  
On 7/19/05, Jacqueline Morris <jacqueline.morris at gmail.com> wrote: 
[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated] 
> _______________________________________
> 
> Interesting - as a member of the WGIG I thought that group consensus
> since February on providing multiple options in the report to the
> Prepcom to negotiate with was reaching an agreement.... obviously I 
> misunderstood the meaning of the word "agreement"! Seems the only
> meaning for "agreement" is to have only one option available.
> Jacqueline Morris
> 
> On 7/18/05, Robert Guerra < rguerra at lists.privaterra.org> wrote:
> > [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated] 
> > _______________________________________
> >
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4692743.stm
> >
> > A UN group charged with deciding how the net should be run has failed 
> > to reach a decision.
> > The group's report suggests four possible futures for net governance
> > that range from no change to complete overhaul.
> > The proposals will go forward to a key UN net and society conference 
> > due to take place in November.
> >
> > The report comes as the US says it plans to keep its role as overseer
> > of the net's core administrative body.
> >
> > [snipped]
> >
> > --
> > Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> > Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>
> >
> > 
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plenary mailing list
> > Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
> >
> 
> 
> --
> ______________________
> Jacqueline Morris
> www.carnivalondenet.com
> T&T Music and videos online 
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary 
> 

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20050719/5c6452d6/attachment.htm