[WSIS CS-Plenary] new version of WSIS CS statement

Jacqueline Morris jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Wed Nov 30 18:47:29 GMT 2005


same problem
Jacqueline
On 11/30/05, Elizabeth Carll, PhD <ecarll at optonline.net> wrote:
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]
>
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!
> _______________________________________
>
> Hi Ralf,
>
> Thank you for all your work on this.  Can you repost the document, as I was
> unable to open as the message indicated document name or path not valid.
> Perhaps there is something amiss with the attachment.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Elizabeth
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org]On
> Behalf Of Ralf Bendrath
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:18 PM
> To: wsis-cs-plenary; WSIS-CT; WSIS CT-Drafting
> Subject: [WSIS CS-Plenary] new version of WSIS CS statement
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> after more than 36 hours of almost constant consultations with various
> groups, caucuses and individuals, and with the help of a number of
> volunteers who refined and polished various parts, we now have a new
> version 3.1 of the WSIS CS statement.
>
> French and Spanish translations are already in the making and will be sent
> to the Plenary and Content&Themes lists as soon as they are ready.
>
> Some caucuses have announced they will submit further input, which will be
> covered in the next - and hopefully final - version.
>
> In case there are French and Spanish contributions, we will need
> volunteers to incorporate them into the English original and the
> translations. Neither Karen nor myself speak French or Spanish. Please
> contact us at <cs-dec at wsis-cs.org> if you can yolunteer for this.
>
> We had to do some editing in order to get a coherent text in terms of flow
> of the arguments, style, level of detail, and lenght. I have told most of
> the people whose submissions had to be edited about the reasons directly.
> I guess you all will understand we did the best we could to incorporate
> all your inputs while at the same time developing a text that can be taken
> as one piece rather than a collection of different papers.
>
> ----------------------------
> Timeline and further process
> ----------------------------
>
> 1. Please try to discuss further input and comments with the respective
> caucuses first. The chapters have headlines that easily lead to the
> caucuses who led the drafting process in these parts. The list of caucuses
> and their contact details is available at
> <http://www.wsis-cs.org/caucuses.html>.
>
> 2. Please try to submit any further input until Friday night (2 December).
> SEND IT TO <cs-dec at wsis-cs.org>
> We will then try to produce a new version over the weekend.
>
> Best, Ralf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>


--
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online



More information about the Plenary mailing list