[WSIS CS-Plenary] Notes from informal consultation with EU
Izumi AIZU
aizu at anr.org
Sun Oct 2 21:35:36 BST 2005
Sep 30, 5 pm -
Civil Society informal consultation meeting with EU
Martin Boyle UK as EU presidency, Michael Niebel from European Commission)
Martin
Here follows is my crude note taken from the informal
consultation meeting with EU, Sep 30.
thanks,
izumi
This is EU proposal on behalf of EU
New position for EU evolution and development
Telecom council last June
Jeanette
Number of concerns:
Not clear forum
How the forum itself is composed
Canadian proposal looks much nicer
Operation mode of WGIG as concrete, that could be built upon
Composition
Governments plan to expand the role of regulation of names and numbers
Part a) IP number blocks taken care of RIR and IANA
Assume position to tell RIR how to do the job or principles, for Ipv6 numbers
We are wondering why governments would like to do that?
Introductory note
“Globally applicable principles” ?
human rights?
How all governments can possibly agree on such policy issues
French like to see global regulatory framework on identifiers
Regional framework
Martin
Thank you for Interesting challenging questions
Forum function
Description really isn’t the last word in full detail, but what is
essentially a need for forum function
My boss, he liked Canadian proposal!
We need coordination among 25 nations and two associate Swiss and Norway
There are areas where everybody has to compromise
Perhaps it is better to elaborate subsequently
Canada plus or less may happen
The dialogue has got to start
If you say too many things, then it is difficult to move to
compromise and develop your ideas
Essential tasks and government plans
Let’s step back from this
We have a situation where there is a general feeling among a lot of
countries that current system is not responsive to their requirement and concerns
We try to identify issues and how to deal with deal issues
The way to describe this is actually in the level of principles
If you are talking about the level of principles, these are not
necessary in conflict with the bottom up exercise of, for example of
IP address allocations
What is “equitable” - etc
So carefully “here is probably where issues exist”
US may turn and say root zone file, we are not going to change”
But there is some need to respond to these concerns
Very concerns if it is not broken, but a lot of dissatisfaction,
then it is going to be broken, hence we feel a need to respond
Europe is a very broad church who do have regulatory instincts and who don’t
Idea to getting involved in defining human right is not an attractive
option in this context
Jeanette
New cooperation model
Multi-stakeholder is one of the pre-requisite
Martin
Yes this is area of delicate
Europe- always consult with key stakeholders, always identify their
actions on society
Not all countries sit down for more open policy creation in public
That’s where the role of forum function
Jermy
Application of global public policy national, regional global
Existing international law? Or establish new legal entity?
Martin
“global public policy” - area of national and global
in Europe we are highly aware
the balance- subsidiarity principle you do at the lowest level possible
one root zone file - can we get arbitration
another more important if you have dispute resolution process
based in country difficult to access - you might have problem
using international law everybody got same
whole RAFT? Cases ICC for arbitration
a matter of if you have matter of global thing you need to do
Wolfgang
Do you plan that new model has a channel for Civil Society advisory, for example.
Where do you draw the border between principle and day-to-day operation?
Martin
Government will not come into existing organization for management.
There might be difficulty between that model and interface with
existing model of other stakeholders
EU
At the end of the day it is the Commission and member states how to run ccTLD
Very lightweight, hands-off very successful result
Rikke
Human rights
Global public policy including international Human Right?
Martin
Subject directly applicable to these topics
Izumi
We are concerned
Not only from EU but other governments, who want more control on
Internet not only in these ICANN areas, but may bring these to other
areas of Internet governance as precedence.
I hope you could address these in the negotiation towards open minded
end, like civil society not towards governments who want to control more.
Jeanette
We like EU to adopt Canadian proposal
From one government to many governments, or from one to no government
Martin
Do you really believe that no government involvement even vaguely possible?
END of Meeting with EU
More information about the Plenary
mailing list