[WSIS CS-Plenary] On the selection committee process

[Meryem Marzouki]

Dear Rik, dear selection committee, dear all,

The Human Rights Caucus is still waiting for the reasons why my own  
name, as HR caucus co-chair, has not been retained. It has been  
transmitted to you by Rikke, HR caucus co-chair, on behalf of our  
caucus. This proposal from the caucus has been reiterated on its list,  
with the clear request to two members of the selection committee to  
forward this proposal to the committee.
I know that I'm not very fashionable (although I don't know if my hair  
are longer that Richard Stallman's).
Is there any other sound reason that the selection committee could  
share with the plenary, or at least with the caucus?

This lack of transparency and accountability from the selection  
committee is really problematic. In addition to the fact that two  
nominated Tunisian Senators are members of this selection committee (2  
out of 6 members, if I'm not wrong).

Finally, the process of collecting supports, undertaken by the HR  
caucus, does not need any support from the selection committee, since  
the nomination proposal is addressed directly to WSIS Secretary-General  
and to WSIS Preparatory Process President.

Best regards,
Meryem Marzouki
HR caucus co-chair

Le vendredi, 14 oct 2005, à 15:36 Europe/Paris, Rik Panganiban a écrit :

> Bertrand, et al,
>
> Of course any civil society group or caucus can communicate directly  
> to the WSIS Executive Secretariat their recommendation for speakers  
> for the WSIS.  And the human rights caucus has done so.
>
> However we have still created a process through a selection committee  
> composed of representatives chosen by the different regional  
> groupings, the CS Bureau and Content and Themes.  The committee is  
> still deliberating on whether or not it can support the nomination.  
>
> I would ask us to first go through our already-agreed process to try  
> and get as much general support as possible.  If this is not possible,  
> than your other option and others should be considered.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Rik Panganiban
> chair of the selection committee
>
> On Oct 14, 2005, at 6:13 AM, Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:
>
> Having Ms. Shirin Ebadi as opening speaker for Civil Society in Tunis  
> would present obvious advantages and her nomination could be forwarded  
> to the Secretariat after a simple endorsement process described below.
>  
> Main advantages
>  
> 1) It would of course put human rights and gender balance at the  
> forefront of the building of inclusive information societies,  
> uderlining that the WSIS process is not only about technology, and  
> that appropriate "enabling environments" also mean freedom of  
> expression and access to information, and "capacity building" also  
> means equal opportunities for men and women, including access to  
> education.
>  
> 2) She comes from a country that is very vocal during the WSIS process  
> and the last PrepCom in Internet Governance and Follow-up discussions  
> : in the first domain, the iranian national representative strongly  
> advocates that Internet Governance should be "transparent and  
> democratic,  with full linvolvement of all stakeholders"; and in the  
> second one, that follow-up at all levels should be done with the  
> participation of all stakeholders.
>  
> If properly briefed on the status of discussions on the draft Tunis  
> Declaration and the written commitments that governments plan to make  
> in WSIS II, she would be in an ideal position to take governments at  
> their own words and describe in plain language how far from these  
> commitments actual practice in some countries really is. This is the  
> opportunity to point the often too large gap between what governments  
> say in international arenas and what they indeed practice at home.
>  
> The WSIS has introduced something new in the international negociation  
> process : witnesses. Civil Society's participation was not what it  
> should have been; but enough organizations were nonetheless present  
> during the process to hear government representatives make commitments  
> they now can be held accountable for.
>  
> Summits are not traditional bilateral negociations where secret is the  
> natural rule. Summit processes are the closest thing to a world  
> Parliament (far from it I know, but still the closest thing), where  
> general principles for our global community (Polity) are elaborated.  
> The first absolute rule of representative democracy is the publicity  
> of debates.
>  
> The ironic situation where citizens of countries (as CS actors) are  
> not even allowed by the rules of procedure to simply listen to what  
> representatives of their own government are saying on their behalf is  
> totally contradictory with the notion of democracy and the  
> transparency principle.  
>  
> 3) Finally, Shirin Ebadi was, if I understand well, the first woman  
> judge in Iran. In most countries, the judiciary is a branch of the  
> State and rightly so. Therefore, she is now a Civil Society actor with  
> a past in the governmental sector, as are today many ex-ministers,  
> presidents, parlementarians and civil servants. This brings an  
> interesting light to the discussion that recently emerged around Adama  
> or some "senators".
>  
> Civil society is and should indeed be open to all individuals that,  
> irrespective of their past functions, engage in governance processes  
> as peers with all other actors, relinquishing whatever privilege they  
> may still have and accepting to be evaluated on their sole "capacity  
> to contribute", rather than the traditional intergovernmental rule of  
> "equal right to oppose" (which is, ultimately, the basic foundation of  
> the UN system under the expression "equal sovereignty of States").
>  
> Choosing Shirin Ebadi is therefore also a symbol of the inclusiveness  
> of Civil Society.
>  
> _______________
>  
> Endorsement process
>  
> Key question is now : if, as it seems from initial reactions, there is  
> a general agreement on her being the favorite CS choice for the  
> opening ceremony, how can this be secured ?
>  
> 1) The principle that Civil society actors accredited to the Summit  
> process should - at least -  have the right to choose who is going to  
> speak on behalf of civil society for the opening ceremony must be  
> strongly reaffirmed; this is a "make or break" principle.
>  
> 2) For obvious reasons, there is no way an absolute consensus can be  
> achieved on the Plenary list and we should not waste time trying to  
> obtain it. We are therefore in the typical situation where rough  
> consensus (as practiced in the internet community) is the only way  
> out.  :
> - there is a need to take a decision (only one slot and a real  
> deadline)
> - absolute consensus cannot be achieved
> - a large majority seems to emerge on a specific name
> - dissenting opinions do not seem to be able to provide an alternative  
> that would be accepted by all
>  
> 3) A two-fold process (taking inspiration from the notion of rough  
> consensus) could therefore be established :
> - a general call on the Plenary list would ask individuals or  
> accredited entities to express support and a formal nomination paper  
> would be transmitted to the Secretariat and Amb. Karklins with an  
> attachment listing accredited entities and individuals supporting the  
> nomination
> - the call would simultaneously invite actors who might still have  
> objections to the nomination (if any) to indicate so and allow them to  
> submit a separate motion (sort of dissenting opinion) with : their  
> name, all potential connexions with participating governments (as a  
> matter of transparency) and - possibly - an alternative speaker they  
> agree upon.
>  
> The second element, that would allow the expression of minority  
> positions, is essential to make the process fully legitimate.
>  
> 4) On a separate basis, CS actors with particular connexions with  
> their governments could make them aware of the ongoing process and ask  
> them to support publicly or more privately to the Secretariat the  
> right of civil society to choose its opening speaker, outlining the  
> bad press the Summit would get if the name of Shirin Ebadi were to be  
> voluntarily refused.
>  
> I hope this will help move forward on this good idea.
>  
> Best
>  
> Bertrand
>  
> -  
>  
>  
>  
>
>
>  
> On 10/14/05, maseger at t-online.de <maseger at t-online.de> wrote:
>
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire  
> list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for  
> specific people]
>
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic  
> translation of this message!
> _______________________________________
>
> Hallo, Meryem! & Friends!
>
> On behalf of my (European umbrella-)Organisation
> I fully support the nomination of Mrs. Shirin Ebadi
> (2003 peace Nobel prize winner) as a keynote speaker
> for CS at the WSIS II Summit, TUNIS.
>
> And I thank Renata for her decision to step aside.
>
> MARIANNE
> (Gender Caucus and European Caucus)
>
> Marianne Seger
> permament European NGO observer
> at the U.N. New York and Geneva
> for
> EURAG European Federation of Older Persons
> GRAZ/AUSTRIA
> ( www.eurag-europe.org)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > On behalf of the small organization which I
> > represent, I wish to say that we most strongly
> > support the nomination of Ms. Ebadi as a keynote
> > speaker for CS at the Tunis Summit, especially
> > under the circumstances and regardless of how
> > much solidarity Adama Samassékou feels with CS
> > (sorry Tracey--but we just don't believe that
> > he's an appropriate CS representative).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Lisa
> > Union for Democratic Communications
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --
>
> > >Dear Amir,
> > >
> > >This is to confirm that Ms. Ebadi has finally managed to make  
> herself
> > >available for the Tunis Summit, despite her busy agenda. We have got
> > >the news very late, that is the reason why I posted only yesterday  
> the
> > >message and have sent yesterday also the letters to Mr Utsumi and to
> > >Amb. Karklins.
> > >The Human Rights caucus is in contact with her, through one of its
> > >members. Her participation is entirely confirmed.
> > >We would be happy to include the West-Asia Family in the list of CS
> > >entities proposing Ms. Ebadi as a speaker for WSIS opening.
> > >
> > >Kind regards,
> > >Meryem
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --
> > Lisa McLaughlin, Ph.D.
> > Associate Professor, Mass Communication & Women's Studies
> > Editor, Feminist Media Studies
> > Director of Graduate Studies, M.A. Program in Mass Communication
> > Union for Democratic Communications Representative,
> > World Summit on the Information Society (http://www.udc.org)
> >
> > Mass Communication
> > Williams Hall
> > Miami University-Ohio
> > Oxford, OH 45056
> > USA
> > Tele: 513-529-3547
> > Fax: 513-529-1835
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
>
>