[WSIS CS-Plenary] accreditation of Human Rights in China

[Bertrand de La Chapelle]

I cannot imagine that the Human Rights Caucus isn't already considering 
preparing such a statement right away ?
 Bertrand 

 On 9/19/05, Tracey Naughton <tracey at traceynaughton.com> wrote: 
> 
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. 
> Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]
> 
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of 
> this message!
> _______________________________________
> 
> Milton et all,
> 
> I was thinking the same thing last night. I prepared the
> accreditation request for the Media Institute of Southern Africa,
> when I worked there. While the submission was thoughtfully and
> carefully prepared I have no doubt at all that hours more work could
> have gone into it to ensure that all details of the organisation and
> its sources of income were included. This was not a matter of non-
> disclosure, but an approach of adequate disclosure to present the
> nature of work and main income sources of the organisation. The
> submission passed through without any further interrogation, let
> alone to the extent that Human Rights in China's submission is being
> examined.
> 
> Clearly the Human Rights in China application has been singled out
> for particular and microscopic attention for political reasons.
> 
> I think it would be appropriate to formulate a statement noting that
> the level of interrogation of this 'file' is not in proportion to
> that afforded to other 'files'.
> 
> Tracey Naughton
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20050919/c4bd1ffc/attachment.html