[WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: [governance] Clarify: CS wrap up meeting(s)?

[Wolfgang Kleinwächter]

I also support this integrated approach. 
 
wolfgang
 

________________________________

From: Milton Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
Sent: Thu 11/2/2006 7:33 AM
To: Vittorio Bertola; karenb at gn.apc.org; governance at lists.cpsr.org; CONGO - Philippe Dam
Cc: plenary at wsis-cs.org
Subject: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: [governance] Clarify: CS wrap up meeting(s)?



[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]

Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!
_______________________________________



>>> karenb at gn.apc.org 11/1/2006 5:42:58 PM >>>
>wouldn't it be possible to combine the congo IG caucus meetings? i
>imagine both would be largely addressing civil society concerns (and
>possibly some good stuff? :) we just need a clear agenda and maybe
>division of facilitation roles? (or, do we have different agendas?)
>
>alac of course is different, but again, any reason why alac can't
>speak to civil society as a whole?. (in  fact, wouldn't it be a good
idea?)

I would strongly support combining all these meetings. ALAC is in fact
no different and should set aside its persistent effort to claim for
itself the mantle of civil society in ICANN, especially now that a
reform which will fold ALAC, NCUC and Nomcom into a more integrated
civil society will probably happen.
_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary