[WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS follow up and implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID

[Ronda Hauben]

What is the focus of GAID? Is this understood? Is it alliance with the
business sector? I had the impression that there was the sense dominant in
the GAID that one had to depend on an alliance with business in order to
develop the infrastructure for the Internet and spread it around the world.

Is this a significant focus of GAID?

I had been trying to understand what was the follow up at the UN of what
happened in Tunis in 2005 and the best I could determine was that it was
GAID. When I tried to understand the focus of GAID it seemed that its
emphasis was a focus on business as needed to invest in infrastructure.

I don't know, however, what others have found who have tried to understand
what is being done in GAID.

Is it that the goal of spreading the Internet around the world at the UN has
been narrowed down to an emphasis on business investing in infrastructure
and setting regulations that will encourage this?

The experience in the US is that putting the leadership of the spread of the
Net in the hands of business has led to the US falling behind a number of
other countries with regard to what percentage of the population has
affordable access to broadband.

So it would be helpful to understand what is happening at the UN with regard
to the followup and furthering of the desire to have affordable (low cost)
broadband access spread to all around the world, the vision that helped as a
thrust for WSIS and Tunis.
Is there a broader agenda than I have referred to? Elsewhere I have gotten
the impression that supporting the spread of the Internet and the use the
Internet should be part of the UN's development agenda, but I haven't seen
much sign of how this is being implemented.

Ronda

ronda.netizen at gmail.com

On 7/9/07, jlfullsack <jlfullsack at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
>  Many thanks to both Philippe for giving this important information and
> Parminder for mentioning its dangerosity !
> I support Parminders concerns about GAID being the compulsory channelling
> organizartion for CS contributions to, and exchanges with, CSTD.
> CS has to have its own and proper process and exchange modalities with
> CSTD, full stop.
> Therefore I join my voice to Parminder's for combating vigourously this
> dirty trick of GAID. This is also the reason for me to disaprove ... my
> friend Parminder in his opinion about GAID such as "We are fine with GAID
> being (...) even an important channel, and we ourselves see GAID as playing
> an important role, and *engage with it strong*ly."
> I never supported the idea of GAID being THE CS relay or even THE MS
> coordination body for WSIS follow-up, especially in the framework of
> bridging the "digital divide" or building information societies in DCs. That
> was in particular CSDPTT's position during the WSIS' second phase, at least
> for one main reason : the relation between CS organizations (present in the
> Plenary) and GAID has never been debated upon nor were some common positions
> agreed on during CS Plenary sessions. In so far there isn't any legitimacy
> for CS being in a formalized partnership with GAID.
> Jean-Louis Fullsack
> President of CSDPTT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>
> *To:* plenary at wsis-cs.org ; bureau at wsis-cs.org ; governance at lists.cpsr.org
> *Cc:* rbloem at ngocongo.org ; 'CONGO - Philippe Dam'<philippe.dam at ngocongo.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 09, 2007 10:39 AM
> *Subject:* RE: [WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS follow up and
> implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot Philippe, for keeping us updated, and making this extremely
> useful summary of important issues in the SG's report.
>
>
>
>
>
> >The SG report seems quite restrictive in defining the involvement of CS
> actors in the CSTD processes. Contrary to the Tunis Agenda which requested
> to take into >account the multi-stakeholder approach, the SG Report defines
> quite poorly the CSTD as an intergovernmental process "*with contributions
> from non-governmental >stakeholders channelled through the multi-stakeholder
> Global Alliance for Information and Communication Technologies and
> Development*" (§14 of E/2007/76). >CONGO considers that this quotation is
> not reflecting paragraph 105 of the Tunis Agenda for the IS and ECOSOC
> Resolution 2006/46: we understand GAID is a >multi-stakeholder component in
> CSTD and ECOSOC, but certainly not the only one, and that NGO contributions
> should not be channelled / screened before >reaching the CSTD / ECOSOC:
> CONGO is therefore willing to correct that in the ECOSOC Plenary.
>
> .
>
>
>
> *I think this is the most serious part which requires urgent attention
> from civil society.* We were at Geneva CSTD meeting, and I don't remember
> during any discussions on multistakeholder (MS) participation GAID being
> mentioned as THE conduit of this participation. Such characterization is
> dangerous, and civil society must put all its weight behind correcting it….
> I do not know how the SG report can put in something which was never even
> brought up, much less agreed to, at the CSTD. Just because GAID had a day of
> the CSTD proceedings for bringing in diverse views, which no doubt was a
> useful effort, doesn't make it THE conduit of MS participation in CSTD.
>
>
>
> CSTD is the apex co-ordination and follow up body for WSIS, and losing the
> privilege of direct and complete participation in its working will be a big
> loss for the CS. First, at the CSTD meeting, as it re-examined its mandate
> and membership it, in fact, ignored the Tunis mandate of ' considering the
> strengthening of the Commission, taking into account the multi-stakeholder
> approach'. This would it in a normal meaning of the text mean that some
> non-governmental membership of CSTD was possible to consider. However, CSTD
> asserted its fully inter-governmental character, and not many in the CS
> challenged this, even if only as a formal assertion of 'acceptance under
> protest' kind.
>
>
>
> While the CSTD's final resolution at Geneva was very good from a
> substantial point of view  - as having integrated information society (IS)
> agenda firmly and centrally in its work, as well as (very importantly)
> putting in place a good reporting mechanism/ interface with all WSIS
> follow-up and implementing agencies – as well as mentioning MS participation
> in CSTD, if only with reference to earlier ECOSOC resolutions which are,
> well, OK, the present document – the SG report – represents a major step
> back.
>
>
>
> Moreover, this lacks political authority, because at no point did CSTD
> discuss GAID as being THE channel of MS participation. It is only one of the
> channels. And we must assert the legitimacy of our direct participation in
> CSTD as per existing ECOSOC resolutions reasserted by the CSTD report, and
> also having made some progress procedurally – on the ground – in Geneva. The
> CSTD/ SG/ GAID secretariats – whoever put this thing in – cannot do such a
> thing on their own.
>
>
>
> Philippe, I think we should put something of the nature of a sign-on
> campaign protesting this part of the document, and for ecosoc to reassert
> direct and full MS participation in CSTD as it stands in ECOSOC resolutions.
> We are fine with GAID being one of the channels, even an important channel,
> and we ourselves see GAID as playing an important role, and engage with it
> strongly. However, the present formulation, as per SG's report, that
> suggests that GAID is THE channel of CS participation in the CSTD is not
> acceptable.
>
>
>
> We should write both the CSTD and to GAID on this to seek clarification,
> and to present our position.
>
>
>
> *Philippe, I am ready to be an active part of this if you devise a
> strategy on how to go ahead with this. We will also like to hear the views
> of the others, but time is short, and therefore I request people to give
> their comments at the earliest. Thanks. *
>
>
>
> Parminder
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> Parminder Jeet Singh
>
> IT for Change, Bangalore
>
> *Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities*
>
> Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890
>
> Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055
>
> *www.ITforChange.net* <http://www.itforchange.net/>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] *On
> Behalf Of *CONGO WSIS - Philippe Dam
> *Sent:* Friday, July 06, 2007 11:35 PM
> *To:* plenary at wsis-cs.org; bureau at wsis-cs.org; governance at lists.cpsr.org
> *Cc:* rbloem at ngocongo.org; 'CONGO - Philippe Dam'
> *Subject:* [WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS follow up and
> implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> As some of you might know, the UN ECOSOC opened its annual substantive
> session earlier this week.
>
> Issues related to the follow up and implementation of WSIS will be
> discussed and addressed by ECOSOC later this month (according to the
> provisional timetable of the ECOSOC session, WSIS follow up might be tabled
> on 23rd and on 25th July).
>
>
>
> In general, the documents addressing WSIS follow up to be considered by
> ECOSOC will be:
>
> -       The SG report on "integrated and coordinated implementation of the
> outcomes of and follow up to major UN conferences and summit" (E/2007/76,
> here attached, to be discussed on 23 July; it contains a series of
> paragraphs in relation to WSIS); See below for some extracts on the various
> post WSIS processes.
>
> -       The final report of the 10th session of the Commission on Science
> and Technology for Development (21-25 May 2007), including the two WSIS
> related decisions of the CSTD (on the flow of information for WSIS follow
> up, and on multi-year programme of work): see E/2007/31, hereby attached as
> well, to be discussed on 25 July.
>
>
>
> As far as we understood from diplomats here in Geneva, there might not be
> any additional negotiation in Geneva. It is expected that the CSDT decision
> will be confirmed by ECOSOC. We will anyway monitor the on going process and
> keep you posted – and hopefully engaged.
>
>
>
> CONGO would be willing to address the ECOSOC on these various issues,
> under the two segments that might be available in this regard. We will of
> course need your remarks, suggestions and feedback.
>
>
>
> *General note*
>
> The SG report recognises that "*implementation and follow-up require a
> broad engagement of non-governmental stakeholders and partners*" (§ 12 of
> E/2007/76).
>
>
>
> *Commission on Science and Technology for Development*
>
> The SG report seems quite restrictive in defining the involvement of CS
> actors in the CSTD processes. Contrary to the Tunis Agenda which requested
> to take into account the multi-stakeholder approach, the SG Report defines
> quite poorly the CSTD as an intergovernmental process "*with contributions
> from non-governmental stakeholders channelled through the multi-stakeholder
> Global Alliance for Information and Communication Technologies and
> Development*" (§14 of E/2007/76). CONGO considers that this quotation is
> not reflecting paragraph 105 of the Tunis Agenda for the IS and ECOSOC
> Resolution 2006/46: we understand GAID is a multi-stakeholder component in
> CSTD and ECOSOC, but certainly not the only one, and that NGO contributions
> should not be channelled / screened before reaching the CSTD / ECOSOC: CONGO
> is therefore willing to correct that in the ECOSOC Plenary.
>
>
>
> *UNGIS and Action Line Facilitators process*
>
> The SG Report only provides a factual description of the creation of the
> UN Group for the Information Society ("Coordination *among the United
> Nations system entities is undertaken by the United Nations Group on the
> Information Society, created by the Secretary-General in accordance with the
> request of the Summit*", § 14 of E/2007/76) and of the May 2007 cluster of
> WSIS action line facilitation meetings.
>
>
>
> *Internet Governance Forum and enhanced cooperation*
>
> The SG Report states that WSIS "*requested the Secretary-General to
> convene the Internet Governance Forum, a new forum for multi-stakeholder
> policy dialogue, to discuss, inter alia, public policy issues related to
> Internet governance in order to foster the sustainability, robustness,
> security, stability and development of the Internet. The inaugural meeting,
> entitled "Internet governance for development", was held in Athens from 30
> October to 2 November 2006, and the second meeting is scheduled to be held
> in Rio de Janeiro from 12 to 15 November 2007. Consultations are under way
> to start a process towards enhanced cooperation among all relevant
> stakeholders with regard to Internet governance, as requested by the Summit
> *" (§ 14 of E/2007/76).
>
>
>
> *Global Alliance for ICT and Development*
>
> The SG Report includes an annexed two-page description of GAID and a
> synopsis of its activities. See pages 21-22 of E/2007/76.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please send us your comments and suggestions in this regard. We will come
> back to you early next week with more details.
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
> *Philippe Dam**
> CONGO - Information Society &
> Human Rights Coordinator
> 11, Avenue de la Paix
> CH-1202 Geneva
> Tel: +41 22 301 1000
> Fax: +41 22 301 2000
> E-mail: **philippe.dam at ngocongo.org* <wphilippe.dam at ngocongo.org>
> *
> Website: **www.ngocongo.org** *
>
> * *
>
> *The Conference of NGOs (CONGO) is an international, membership
> association that facilitates the participation of NGOs in United Nations
> debates and decisions. Founded in 1948, CONGO's major objective is to ensure
> the presence of NGOs in exchanges among the world's governments and United
> Nations agencies on issues of global concern.  For more information see our
> website at **www.ngocongo.org***
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> J'utilise la version gratuite de SPAMfighter pour utilisateurs privés.
> 10380 e-mails spam ont été bloqués jusqu'à maintenant.
> Les utilisateurs payant n'ont pas ce message dans leurs e-mails.
> Essayez SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/lfr> gratuitement
> maintenant!
>
>



-- 
Netizens: On the History and Impact of Usenet and the Internet

http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/netbook
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20070709/ae2378a2/attachment.html