[WSIS CS-Plenary] Opening ceremony speaker
adel.elzaim at canti.com
adel.elzaim at canti.com
Mon Nov 10 03:59:50 GMT 2003
Hello,
I strongly support this suggestion.
Adel
------------------------------------
Adel El Zaim
adel.elzaim at canti.com
adel at elzaim.net
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:06 , Bertrand de LA CHAPELLE <lachapelle at openwsis.org> sent:
>Hi all,
>
>Choosing who will speak in the opening ceremony is important
>to be sure our views are faithfully expressed and to enhance
>media coverage. But it is also about strategically
>ESTABLISHING THE RIGHT FOR CIVIL SOCIETY TO NOMINATE WHO
>WILL REPRESENT IT.
>
>Therefore, as the goal is to set a precedent upon which we
>can build later, we need to choose someone reflecting CS
>views on the Information Society that cannot be rebuffed or
>refused by any government.
>
>For these reasons, why not invite for the opening ceremony
>speech Tim Berners-Lee, THE inventor of the World Wide Web
>and the Director of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) ?
>
>This would present many advantages, reminding participants
>and in particular governments :
>- that the Information Society they keep talking about is
>fundamentally organized around the World Wide Web, which was
>invented by civil society (indeed a single human : how more
>civil society can you be ?)
>- that without wanting to protect or patent his invention,
>Berners-Lee made it a gift to the whole world, showing that
>if legal protection can help innovation, it is not always a
>necessity;
>- that the creation of this global commons (an open
>standard) has triggerd a multi-trillion dollar industry and
>impacted society in a way similar only to the printing press
>or electricity
>- that new frontiers are being explored (the so-
>called "Semantic web" of the highest importance for cultural
>and linguistic diversity).
>
>Beyond singlehandedly inventing the Web, Tim Berners-lee
>also designed the World Wide Web Consortium or W3C), an
>innovative multi-stakeholder decision-making and standard-
>setting process dedicated to addressing the issues raised by
>its development.
>
>In a nutshel, TBL did not only promote the values we defend
>(global commons, open architectures and standards, flexible
>frameworks for dialogue involving a wide variety of
>stakeholders, access to information, transparency, non-
>profit approach, ...); he also implemented them in
>everything he did.
>
>The very success of what he created is the best proof that
>those principles do work. Nobody is in a better position
>(credibility) to expose the present attacks against some of
>the founding principles of the Internet and the Web that CS
>cares about.
>
>Other advantage : no government in its sane mind can take
>the risk of the public ridicule of refusing the floor in a
>summit on the Information Society to the very man who, more
>than anyone, helped it happen. Should Civil Society agree on
>his nomination through the present process (and provided of
>course he can and wants to participate), his name could be
>given with no alternative option, thereby establishing CS
>right to nominating its own speakers.
>
>I hope you will find this suggestion useful and capable of
>triggering a rapid consensus. Many things can be added.
>
>But as my view may be biased, I encourage suggestions,
>comments and critics on this one. In particular, I recognize
>TBL, as a white male living in the US, does not help on the
>criterias of gender and geographical balance.
>
>Should a decision be taken among us, I am sure many of you
>are in a position to help contact TBL if necessary and we
>should select the best channel .
>
>Cheers to all
>
>Bertrand
>_______________________________________________
>Plenary mailing list
>Plenary at wsis-cs.org
>http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
---- Msg sent via iPowerWeb WebMail System - http://www.ipowerweb.com
More information about the Plenary
mailing list