[WSIS CS-Plenary] bureau organization

[Vittorio Bertola]

William Drake ha scritto:
> always attract big populations.  So as we look to the next phase of WSIS,
> would it not make more sense for us to think about how we have actually
> self-organized and have a bureau comprising people from the most active,
> member-based groupings, irrespective of whether they're called families,
> working groups, or caucuses?

I must say that, even after some months of participation to this process, 
I still don't see any actual need for this diversification - and I'm sure 
that many of us do not even understand what the exact difference is 
supposed to be among the three types (I remember a discussion on this 
matter a few weeks ago).

Perhaps we should aim for a simpler structure in which you have the 
plenary plus thematic groups created on a voluntary basis (whoever wants 
to discuss a subject that is not already covered by another group may 
create a new one).
-- 
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo vb.
Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu.org
http://bertola.eu.org/    <-- Vecchio sito, nuovo toblog!