[WSIS CS-Plenary] drastic changes to the proposed WSIS implementation mechanisms in the new text

[Dr. Francis MUGUET]

English/ Français

Dear Bertrand et al.

>
> If I remember well, the reference to UNGA resolution 57/270B was also 
> specifically and repetitively made by the US delegation as a way to 
> prevent the establishment of any new implementation mechanism.

Not ii writing, but orally yes

> On a statement related to the importance of the changes, time is very 
> short indeed but the real moment to speak out is September 6, during 
> the open meeting of the Friends of the Chair. Preparing a statement 
> for that date would probably be better than rushing to meet the 
> deadline of August 31st. Who will be there on September 6th ? (I will 
> attend). 

I will be there too

>  
> Note : I have opened a page on wsis-online for this event. (go to : 
> http://www.wsis-online.net/smsi/classes/won/events/won-events-507606/event-view 
> <http://www.wsis-online.net/smsi/classes/won/events/won-events-507606/event-view>?) 
> Those who plan to attend can (if they are registered on wsis-online of 
> course ..) click on the "I will attend" button on the right hand side 
> of the page and the list of participants on the page will 
> automatically update. This will avoid the endless ping-pong we have on 
> the list every time we try to know who will attend a particular meeting).

Excellent idea,  we should use modern collaborative ( free ) software.

There are two distinct issues :
1/ Implementation and follow-up is *not* on the agenda of the PrepCom3.
2/ The drastic and sudden modification of the GFC languages.

The first is a question of procedure, and the CSB should write a note to 
Karklins concerning this
matter:
When and where the Implementation and follow-up follow up will be 
discussed. ?
The second is a matter of content, and therefore all the groups should 
reinforce their
adovacy efforts with governements.
Of course, the procedural issue becomes all the more important that the
content becomes more problematic.

See you

Francis

----------------------------------------------------------

Cher Bertrand et aliis

Il y a deux problèmes conceptuellement différents :
1/ La mise en oeuvre et le suivi ne sont pas à l'agenda du PrepCom3
2/ La modification soudaine et drastique des propositions du GFC

La question 1/ est une question de procédure du ressort du
Bureau de la Société Civile. 
Quand va-t-on donc discuter du suivi ?
Le 2/ est une question de contenu, et, bien sur;
 la question de procédure
devient d'autant plus brulante  que le contenu devient
problématique

A+

Francis