[WSIS CS-Plenary] Proposed statement to GFC on paras 10, 11 and 29

[Adam Peake]

** please cut very long messages, no need to send 
and re-send pages of old messages. **


Parminder, thanks.  This is good.

Suggest you change "We will like to see the 
present suggested mechanism, based on ..."

We suggest that follow-up and implementation mechanisms are based on...

But I'm not too worried.


Add me as:

Adam Peake, Center for Global Communications (GLOCOM), Tokyo

Thanks,

Adam




At 2:52 PM +0530 8/31/05, Parminder wrote:
>
>Dear Wolfgang,
>
>I agree. So the text now stands as
>
>1.    The undersigned organisations and individuals from the Civil Society
>strongly oppose the move to make the proposed changes in paras 10, 11 and 29
>of the operational part of the Tunis document, as per the new input document
>circulated by the chair of the GFC. These changes do not represent the
>contributions of the various stakeholders to the existing text, and their
>acceptance will defeat the stated purpose of the Tunis summit, described as
>the 'summit of solutions', to make some real headway in implementing the
>promises of the Geneva summit.
>
>2.    We will like to see the present suggested mechanism, based on
>stakeholder teams around action lines with a well-defined overall
>co-ordination body, as contained in the existing paras 10, 11 and 29,
>improved and elaborated through a multi-stakeholder consultative process to
>ensure that an adequate and necessary post-WSIS structure is in place, not
>only for implementing the outcomes of WSIS but also to take up Information
>Society issues as they come up.
>
>Parminder
>
>_________________________________________________
>Parminder Jeet Singh
>IT for Change
>Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities
>91-80-26654134
>www.ITforChange.net
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] On Behalf
>Of Wolfgang Kleinwächter
>Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:22 PM
>To: plenary at wsis-cs.org; plenary at wsis-cs.org
>Subject: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Proposed statement to GFC on paras 10, 11 and
>29
>
>[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list.
>Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people.
>Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
>_______________________________________
>
>I support the document but would delete in para two the part "These changes
>are too drastic". Just start the sentence by saying "They do not
>represent....".
>
>Wolfgang Kleinwächter
>University of Aarhus
>Member of the Civil Society WSIS Bureau
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>Von: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von Parminder
>Gesendet: Mi 31.08.2005 10:10
>An: plenary at wsis-cs.org
>Betreff: RE: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Proposed 
>statement to GFC on paras 10, 11 and 29
>
>Hi All,
>
>The following is the two-para statement that I propose organisations and
>individuals endorse in the next 15 hours. I can forward the statement in the
>names of those who endorse it on this list in this time-period.
>
>1.    The undersigned organisations and individuals from the Civil Society
>strongly oppose the move to make the proposed changes in paras 10, 11 and 29
>of the operational part of the Tunis document, as per the new input document
>circulated by the chair of the GFC. These changes are too drastic, they do
>not represent the contributions of the various stakeholders to the existing
>text, and their acceptance will defeat the stated purpose of the Tunis
>summit, described as the 'summit of solutions', to make some real headway in
>implementing the promises of the Geneva summit.
>
>2.    We will like to see the present suggested mechanism, based on
>stakeholder teams around action lines with a well-defined overall
>co-ordination body, as contained in the existing paras 10, 11 and 29,
>improved and elaborated through a multi-stakeholder consultative process to
>ensure that an adequate and necessary post-WSIS structure is in place, not
>only for implementing the outcomes of WSIS but also to take up Information
>Society issues as they come up.
>
>Thanks Bill. I count CPSR on.
>
>Parminder