[WSIS CS-Plenary] Proposed statement to GFC on paras 10, 11 and 29

[richard jordan]

THANK YOU SO MUCH -- totally agree. Richard J.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Peake" <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>
To: plenary at wsis-cs.org
Subject: RE: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Proposed statement to GFC on paras 10, 11 and 29
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:10:18 +0900

> 
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the 
> entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended 
> for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
> _______________________________________
> 
> ** please cut very long messages, no need to send and re-send pages 
> of old messages. **
> 
> 
> Parminder, thanks.  This is good.
> 
> Suggest you change "We will like to see the present suggested 
> mechanism, based on ..."
> 
> We suggest that follow-up and implementation mechanisms are based on...
> 
> But I'm not too worried.
> 
> 
> Add me as:
> 
> Adam Peake, Center for Global Communications (GLOCOM), Tokyo
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 2:52 PM +0530 8/31/05, Parminder wrote:
> >
> > Dear Wolfgang,
> >
> > I agree. So the text now stands as
> >
> > 1.    The undersigned organisations and individuals from the Civil Society
> > strongly oppose the move to make the proposed changes in paras 10, 11 and 29
> > of the operational part of the Tunis document, as per the new input document
> > circulated by the chair of the GFC. These changes do not represent the
> > contributions of the various stakeholders to the existing text, and their
> > acceptance will defeat the stated purpose of the Tunis summit, described as
> > the 'summit of solutions', to make some real headway in implementing the
> > promises of the Geneva summit.
> >
> > 2.    We will like to see the present suggested mechanism, based on
> > stakeholder teams around action lines with a well-defined overall
> > co-ordination body, as contained in the existing paras 10, 11 and 29,
> > improved and elaborated through a multi-stakeholder consultative process to
> > ensure that an adequate and necessary post-WSIS structure is in place, not
> > only for implementing the outcomes of WSIS but also to take up Information
> > Society issues as they come up.
> >
> > Parminder
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> > Parminder Jeet Singh
> > IT for Change
> > Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities
> > 91-80-26654134
> > www.ITforChange.net
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] On Behalf
> > Of Wolfgang Kleinwächter
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:22 PM
> > To: plenary at wsis-cs.org; plenary at wsis-cs.org
> > Subject: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Proposed statement to GFC on paras 10, 11 and
> > 29
> >
> > [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list.
> > Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people.
> > Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
> > _______________________________________
> >
> > I support the document but would delete in para two the part "These changes
> > are too drastic". Just start the sentence by saying "They do not
> > represent....".
> >
> > Wolfgang Kleinwächter
> > University of Aarhus
> > Member of the Civil Society WSIS Bureau
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > Von: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von Parminder
> > Gesendet: Mi 31.08.2005 10:10
> > An: plenary at wsis-cs.org
> > Betreff: RE: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Proposed statement to GFC on paras 
> > 10, 11 and 29
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The following is the two-para statement that I propose organisations and
> > individuals endorse in the next 15 hours. I can forward the statement in the
> > names of those who endorse it on this list in this time-period.
> >
> > 1.    The undersigned organisations and individuals from the Civil Society
> > strongly oppose the move to make the proposed changes in paras 10, 11 and 29
> > of the operational part of the Tunis document, as per the new input document
> > circulated by the chair of the GFC. These changes are too drastic, they do
> > not represent the contributions of the various stakeholders to the existing
> > text, and their acceptance will defeat the stated purpose of the Tunis
> > summit, described as the 'summit of solutions', to make some real headway in
> > implementing the promises of the Geneva summit.
> >
> > 2.    We will like to see the present suggested mechanism, based on
> > stakeholder teams around action lines with a well-defined overall
> > co-ordination body, as contained in the existing paras 10, 11 and 29,
> > improved and elaborated through a multi-stakeholder consultative process to
> > ensure that an adequate and necessary post-WSIS structure is in place, not
> > only for implementing the outcomes of WSIS but also to take up Information
> > Society issues as they come up.
> >
> > Thanks Bill. I count CPSR on.
> >
> > Parminder
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary