[WSIS CS-Plenary] UN at odds over internet's future

Jacqueline Morris jacqueline.morris at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 16:39:40 BST 2005


Bertrand
You are correct. How can we turn this around now? Or can we?
Jacqueline

On 7/19/05, Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The other approach from the press is basically the UN versus US battle.
>  
> Unfortunately this only reflects the fact that the group did not devote
> attention to the framing of its public presentation but left the press to
> define its own understanding from the document itself. No doubt they went to
> the simplistic presentation. 
>  
> I'm afraid the opportunity has been missed to emphqsize the originality of
> the group, the approach it took and how it considers its report as a
> positive outcome.
>  
> Bertrand
> 
>  
> On 7/19/05, Jacqueline Morris <jacqueline.morris at gmail.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list.
> Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people.
> Your cooperation is highly appreciated] 
> > _______________________________________
> > 
> > Interesting - as a member of the WGIG I thought that group consensus
> > since February on providing multiple options in the report to the
> > Prepcom to negotiate with was reaching an agreement.... obviously I 
> > misunderstood the meaning of the word "agreement"! Seems the only
> > meaning for "agreement" is to have only one option available.
> > Jacqueline Morris
> > 
> > On 7/18/05, Robert Guerra < rguerra at lists.privaterra.org> wrote:
> > > [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire
> list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific
> people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated] 
> > > _______________________________________
> > >
> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4692743.stm
> > >
> > > A UN group charged with deciding how the net should be run has failed 
> > > to reach a decision.
> > > The group's report suggests four possible futures for net governance
> > > that range from no change to complete overhaul.
> > > The proposals will go forward to a key UN net and society conference 
> > > due to take place in November.
> > >
> > > The report comes as the US says it plans to keep its role as overseer
> > > of the net's core administrative body.
> > >
> > > [snipped]
> > >
> > > --
> > > Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> > > Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Plenary mailing list
> > > Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> > > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > ______________________
> > Jacqueline Morris
> > www.carnivalondenet.com
> > T&T Music and videos online 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plenary mailing list
> > Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary 
> > 
> 
> 


-- 
______________________
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online



More information about the Plenary mailing list