[WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: Speaker nomination process [u]

[Robert Guerra [c]]

I still think that after 2 years, it might be a good idea to revisit  
the names proposed in Geneva to see if in fact they are ok for the  
Tunis summit - or if we want to consider additional names.

The CSB is the body in charge of logistics, but as a bureau member  
i'm disappointed that no planning,  or discussion of any kind  is  
taking place on the bureau list. Personally i would prefer that needs  
be identified well in advance so that a discussion and agreement can  
be obtained on how the logistical needs - such as speakers,  
overpasses, etc - can be taken done.

You and others seem to propose that we just adopt the speakers  
suggested from the discussion 2 years ago, well that's definitely a  
possibility. Let's see what others have to say - and see if there's  
agreement. if so, fine we have a solution. If not, then let's see  
which additional names might come up. That's all I propose

regards,

Robert

--
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>




On 29-Jun-05, at 8:11 AM, Jean-Louis FULLSACK wrote:

>
> BTW : I do hope that the long serial we had do endure before the  
> Geneva Summit for "speakers nominantions" will not happen again. I  
> know some among us who are already in the starting blocks for the  
> race for the desk ! Let's first debate on WHAT should be told to  
> the folks : this will eliminate a lot of candidates and our choice  
> will be largely facilitated. Our mailbox will appreciate it too.