AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: Speaker nomination process [u]

[Robert Guerra [c]]

The list is a good start. would anyone object it being planned on a  
wiki for further development and comment?

regards

Robert
--
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>




On 29-Jun-05, at 10:29 AM, Milton Mueller wrote:

> This is a very good list, Wolfgang. Do we (CS) have that many  
> slots? If
> so, finding "the most convincing person(s)" to fill each of them would
> be a good procedure. --MM
>
>
>>>> wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de 06/29/05 9:57 AM
>>>>
>>>>
> With regard to themes, I think we need statements for
> * financing
> * human capacity building
> * integration of MDG goals and WSIS aims&principles
> * IPR
> * Internet Governance (both instiutional aspects as well as issue
> aspects)
> * Gender
> * freedom of expression
> * community media
> * privacy and data protection
> * training & research (Divinas Declarration)
> * etc.
>
> With regard to procedures
> * multistakeholderism (in general, conceptual aspects)
> * follow up & implementation
> * possibilities for formalization (an enhanced but simplified version
> of the convention idea)
>
> And again, I say this as a member of the Bureau, the receommednations
> has to come from the Caucus and WGs. The CSB is for procedural aspects
> only. CSB has to fight for speaking slots, but not to decide about
> content related issues.
>
> Best
>
> wolfganbg
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von Robert Guerra [c]
> Gesendet: Mi 29.06.2005 14:39
> An: plenary at wsis-cs.org
> Betreff: Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: Speaker nomination process [u]
>
>
>
> I still think that after 2 years, it might be a good idea to revisit
> the names proposed in Geneva to see if in fact they are ok for the
> Tunis summit - or if we want to consider additional names.
>
> The CSB is the body in charge of logistics, but as a bureau member
> i'm disappointed that no planning,  or discussion of any kind  is
> taking place on the bureau list. Personally i would prefer that needs
> be identified well in advance so that a discussion and agreement can
> be obtained on how the logistical needs - such as speakers,
> overpasses, etc - can be taken done.
>
> You and others seem to propose that we just adopt the speakers
> suggested from the discussion 2 years ago, well that's definitely a
> possibility. Let's see what others have to say - and see if there's
> agreement. if so, fine we have a solution. If not, then let's see
> which additional names might come up. That's all I propose
>
> regards,
>
> Robert
>
> --
> Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>
>
>
>
>
> On 29-Jun-05, at 8:11 AM, Jean-Louis FULLSACK wrote:
>
>
>>
>> BTW : I do hope that the long serial we had do endure before the
>> Geneva Summit for "speakers nominantions" will not happen again. I
>> know some among us who are already in the starting blocks for the
>> race for the desk ! Let's first debate on WHAT should be told to
>> the folks : this will eliminate a lot of candidates and our choice
>> will be largely facilitated. Our mailbox will appreciate it too.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
>