[WSIS CS-Plenary] Big concerns

[Robert Guerra]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I too am concerned.

Discussions related to both the Global Alliance and CS-Private sector 
statements did take place, but didn't go through an open process.

Though it's easy to quick respond and come up with a document in 
smaller spaces, the effort needs to be done to have those in this - 
plenary - space involved.

In regards to "global alliance" - i can't see it as a purely "virtual 
body". As it seems to have a "set" launch date - it without a doubt 
people will people and/or organizations to sit as  members. If that's 
the case, could we not go through the same type of open process we 
did when submitting names to the WGIG.

just an idea..

regards

Robert





At 7:18 PM +0100 3/13/05, Jean-Louis FULLSACK wrote:
>Dear Lisa
>
>Once again, I can't but share your opinion end your abevation of 
>what is happening inside "our CS". Global Alliance, CS-Private 
>sector common statements (before joint venture probably), and DSF 
>are some of the most critical issues we are facing.
>
>A d hope that our "activists" will accept a "cease-fire" befor we 
>meet again to discuss really anf thoroughly all these issues
>
>Best regards
>
>Jean-Louis Fullsack
>
>CSDPTT


- -- 
###
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Privaterra - <http://www.privaterra.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.0 (Build 1799)

iQA/AwUBQjSNf8uFlu8JRpsDEQhqWgCeKiaaABOU8RoXXgcsVV/XS5+w7EcAn0j1
Cr76NfOLY8NtXIHQyHlcEjAA
=YvJ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----