[Working Methods] Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] [CS Bureau] Re: Process for nominating CS speakers for summit

[karen banks]

hi

I suggest we start with a review and evaluation of the process from phase I 
- remembering that it took up 3 months or our valuable time only to have 
the ITU make the final decisions - let's not let that happen again

karen

At 20:01 28/06/2005, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>avri doria ha scritto:
>>I think it is.  We really have very little time to get back on track
>>before the Prepcom.  It would be a pity if working methods did not have
>>recommendations to make to the plenary on all of its tasks, including
>>methods of choosing speakers.
>
>So... let's start the discussion. (Still copying the plenary, but I agree 
>we should move it to the Working Methods WG.)
>
>I do not know what was done for the first Summit two years ago, but the 
>first question I would pose is: which kind of people do we want as speakers?