[WSIS CS-Plenary] [Fwd: List of speakers for Sub-Committee A - 13 Nov.]

[Jean-Louis FULLSACK]

Dear Wolfgang and all
Whenever the role of gouvernments is questioned and its action pushed aside I'm concerned ! When the threat comes from the CS I'm in trouble. This is rather due to the "ambiant air" of worldwide deregulation and negation of states' role maintained by the neoconservative order, than to my own "state dogmatism". That also applies for Internet gouvernance. As you may know I don't consider myself as an expert in Internet matters. But before telling the intergouvernmental Plenary on behalf of CS in what gouvernements are not needed to be involved, please state at least clearly what they are reponsible for !  
If you don't agree on my opinion, and if the CS Plenary isn't clearly backing your proposal (once you have submitted the draft of your statement) it would be preferable you speak on behalf of your University. 
Best 
Jean-Louis Fullsack
CSDPTT 

> Message du 12/11/05 00:26
> De : "Wolfgang Kleinwächter" 
> A : plenary at wsis-cs.org, plenary at wsis-cs.org
> Copie à : 
> Objet : RE: [WSIS CS-Plenary] [Fwd: List of speakers for Sub-Committee A - 13 Nov.]
> 
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]
> 
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!
> _______________________________________
> 
> I would be interested to say something about oversight (in case a situation deveklops where is a need to intervene into the intergovernmental debate). The general message would be - like in our "rough consensus statement" and in my article for the WGIG book - there is no need to have governmental involvement in the root zone file management. I can do this on behalf of the caucus or as former WGIG member or as University of Aarhus.
> 
> Best
> 
> w
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org on behalf of Jeanette Hofmann
> Sent: Fri 11/11/2005 7:19 PM
> To: plenary at wsis-cs.org
> Subject: [WSIS CS-Plenary] [Fwd: List of speakers for Sub-Committee A - 13 Nov.]
> 
> 
> 
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]
> 
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!
> _______________________________________
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> as you can see from Phillipe's mail below, we have again speaking slots
> for Sub-Committee A meetings to fill. Most if not all rules from prepcom
> 3 apply also for 3 bis:
> 
> 1. We have 15 minutes per 6 hours meeting time
> 
> 2. Our interventions in sub-committee A really need to focus on the
> paragraphs under negotiation. General statements are a waste of time.
> 
> 3. Relevant documents for Subcommittee-A can be found here:
> [http://www.itu.int/wsis/preparatory2/pc3/index.html#re] Alas, most of
> the links seem not to work at the moment.
> 
> The Internet Governance Caucus doesn't know yet exactly how many
> speaking slots it needs, certainly one for sunday and one for monday. As
> indicated in Phillipe's mail below, the gender caucus needs a slot too.
> If there are many requests from other caucuses, I'd suggest we reduce
> speaking time to 3 minutes in order to accomodate more speakers.
> 
> Please get back to me a.s.a.p. if you need a speaking slot for
> sub-committee A. If possible, please specify at what day and meeting you
> wish to speak and the subject you want to address.
> 
> Below you find the details in Phillipe's mail to us:
> 
> Jeannette and Adam,
> 
> 
> 
> Such as during PrepCom-3, observers will have to follow the regular
> procedures as regards their participation in Sub-committee meetings.
> Among others, we have to forward the ITU a list of speakers *at least
> half an hour before the beginning of each session*.
> 
> 
> 
> I would really appreciate if the IG caucus could *coordinate* among
> itself and with other caucuses before Sunday morning to determine the
> names of speakers for the 1st meeting of Sub-Committee A (Sunday,
> 12:15-15:00).
> 
> 
> 
> I was notified that *Magaly Pazello* has got a statement ready and wants
> to deliver it at this 1^st Sub-Com. A meeting.
> 
> I guess as well that the *IG caucus* will also take the floor.
> 
> 
> 
> For each speaker, the ITU needs the following information:
> 
> - Name of the Speaker
> 
> - Name of his/her accredited civil society organisation
> 
> - Name of the entity/ies on behalf of which he takes the floor
> (caucus, WG, coalitions, ...).
> 
> 
> 
> The ITU would also like to get hard copies or electronic *written
> versions* of the statements when available no later than the beginning
> of the session.
> 
> 
> 
> Observers will be allowed to take the floor *15 minutes for each 6 hours
> of meeting*. It is up to you to decide how to use this time (15 minutes
> in a row, or twice 7'30'').
> 
> 
> 
> Please, Jeannette and Adam, come back to me on Sunday morning (or
> before!!) about that.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Philippe
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20051112/eb75a8a2/attachment.htm