[WSIS CS-Plenary] Trade group embroiled in ICANN dispute
mclauglm at po.muohio.edu
mclauglm at po.muohio.edu
Wed Nov 30 15:02:58 GMT 2005
Story URL: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/legal/0,39020651,39238834,00.htm
Trade group embroiled in ICANN dispute
Staff
Reuters
November 29, 2005, 15:55 GMT
A trade group of Internet businesses challenged a
proposed settlement over control of the .com
domain as a violation of US antitrust laws in a
lawsuit filed in a California federal court on
Monday.
The World of Domain Name Developers group asked
the court to stop ICANN - the non-profit body
overseeing the Internet's addressing system -
from allowing VeriSign to maintain control of the
lucrative .com domain until 2012.
That proposed deal, reached in October, settled a
long-running dispute between ICANN and VeriSign
and is expected to be finalised by the end of the
year.
The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in
San Jose on Monday, said the proposed settlement
violates federal laws against price fixing and
creates a monopoly of the .com and .net domain
name markets.
Plaintiffs' attorney Patrick Cathcart said the
settlement fixes the price of registering any
.com or .net far above market rates. He also said
terms of the settlement guarantee VeriSign annual
price increases at double the rate of inflation.
ICANN could not be reached for comment, while a
spokesman for VeriSign declined to comment on
pending litigation.
The original dispute between VeriSign and ICANN
arose after VeriSign introduced a new service
called Site Finder in September 2003, directing
Internet users who mistyped domain names to a
VeriSign site that allowed consumers to choose
from a list of alternative names. VeriSign
planned to make money by selling advertisements
on the site.
ICANN ordered VeriSign to temporarily shut down
the service a month later, after engineers said
it could interfere with the stability of the
Internet.
VeriSign then sued in February 2004, saying the
Internet body had overstepped its authority and
illegally restrained competition. The case was
thrown out of US court in August 2004, but
VeriSign refiled in California state court.
The two parties reached a proposed settlement in
October, in which VeriSign maintained control of
the database of 35 million .com domain names
until 2012. The contract would have otherwise
come up for renewal in 2007.
VeriSign makes $6 (£3.50) per year from each of
the 35 million .com domain names in use. It also
controls the .net domain, which contains nearly 6
million names.
The settlement also requires ICANN to review
within 90 days new products or services
introduced by VeriSign and its competitors that
might affect the domain name system.
--
Lisa McLaughlin, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Mass Communication & Women's Studies
Editor, Feminist Media Studies
Director of Graduate Studies, M.A. Program in Mass Communication
Union for Democratic Communications Representative,
World Summit on the Information Society
Mass Communication
Williams Hall
Miami University-Ohio
Oxford, OH 45056
USA
Tele: 513-529-3547
Fax: 513-529-1835
More information about the Plenary
mailing list