[WSIS CS-Plenary] Plenary: Reporting and discussion

Bertrand de La Chapelle bdelachapelle at gmail.com
Sun Sep 25 08:17:37 BST 2005


I support Karen's proposal, even if Richard's comment is of course true.
 Bertrand

 On 9/24/05, Richard Vincent <cmvince at isugw.indstate.edu> wrote:
>
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list.
> Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]
>
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of
> this message!
> _______________________________________
>
> Dear friends,
>
> A new list may be possible, as Karen suggests. Another approach, however,
> may be for those not directly interested to simply change their subscription
> options to the once a day digest version. That too would reduce the
> frequency of messages. Just a thought...
>
> Rick
>
> Dr. Richard C. Vincent
> Professor
> Department of Communication
> Indiana State University
> Terre Haute, IN 47809
> U.S.A.
>
> email: rvincent at indstate.edu
> telephone: +1 812 237-3246
> fax: +1 812 237-3217
> >>> karenb at gn.apc.org 09/24/05 10:49 AM >>>
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list.
> Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]
>
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of
> this message!
> _______________________________________
>
> dear all,
>
> I've had quite a few people unsubscribe from the plenary list, who are not
> in geneva - not because they are not interested in following the process,
> but because the volume of the list is simply too high.
>
> This always happens during prepcom as we use the list intensively for
> discussions, planning, drafting, reporting - some of which is very
> important to those of us present, but which has a very short 'shelf-life'
> and is not very useful to those following remotely.
>
> I was wondering if it would be useful to create a new list which would
> simply be for reports, drafts of statements and final statements.
>
> For example, anyone who is monitoring sub-committee, reports from the CS
> bureau meetings, reports from meetings with government delegatations etc.
>
> I think people participating remotely would miss the 'sense' or 'feel' of
> the process, but if this was important, they would need to stay subscribed
> to the plenary.
>
> I would be happy to put some time into this, for example, by liaising with
> monitors of sub-committee, our working group focal points etc, and posting
> reports to this new list with clear subject lines - and - to post copies
> of
> reports that have been written to date.
>
> the list could be called plenary-reports (or something similar)
>
> karen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20050925/6dddfbaf/attachment.html


More information about the Plenary mailing list