[WSIS CS-Plenary] Fw: startup post from gurstein@adm.njit.edu requires approval

Tue Apr 18 15:32:18 BST 2006

Dear Mr. Gurstein,
First of all, thank you for noticing my silly mistake in re-typing the 
text of the Tunis Agenda: of course it should be "public/private 
partnerships". Thank you!
Second, the message of late yesterday sent to, among others, Renate was 
supposed to be followed today by requests to her and others to tell us who 
else from the civil society should be invited. So, thank you, once more, 
for helping us disseminate this news and the invitation. Please spread the 
word!
BTW, I did not see Renate's message to which you refer in your message.
Now, on a more important subject. I am expressing my own PERSONAL opinion 
here, but I take a strong exception to your statement that this 
consultation is "simply another means to perpetuate existing closed door 
exclusionary processes". 
We strongly believe that we must use ANY opportunity to build bridges and 
ensure engagement of all who care about spreading the wonders of 
information revolution. We in the ICT Task Force have been trying very 
hard to do this, by all means at our disposal, and any honest observer has 
to acknowledge that we were at least partially successful in promoting 
inclusiveness. 
We all know that many actors, primarily those from the civil society, do 
not have the means to participate physically in all events. This is why 
our consultations on the Global Alliance took almost TWO years, with 
multiple physical meetings in conjunction with all relevant events, PLUS 
virtual discussions. 
What would you like us to do in this particular case - pay for everybody 
who want/should be present in Geneva? You know full well that we in the UN 
do not have the money. Does it mean that we should not use the opportunity 
presented by the Information Week in Geneva to gather as many participants 
as we possibly can in one room?
This will be the first in a series of consultation on Action Line 11. In 
addition to this physical meeting, there will be a web-based forum.
I think we all should focus on ways to promote inclusiveness and 
engagement. There is too much skepticism, suspicion and mistrust already, 
so let us try to move forward together, even if in small - but practical, 
realistic and sustainable - steps.
Best regards, 
Sergei.

Sergei Kambalov, Chief
ECOSOC and Interorganizational Cooperation Branch
Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination/DESA
United Nations, New York
Tel:  (212) 963-4751
Fax:  (212) 963-7454
Email:  kambalov at un.org
----- Forwarded by sergei kambalov/NY/UNO on 18/04/2006 08:40 AM -----

startup-owner at unicttaskforce.org 
Sent by: mailman-bounces at unicttaskforce.org
18/04/2006 07:23 AM

To
startup-owner at unicttaskforce.org
cc

Subject
startup post from gurstein at adm.njit.edu requires approval

As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:

    List:    startup at unicttaskforce.org
    From:    gurstein at adm.njit.edu
    Subject: FW: [startup] Consultations on Action Line 11 of WSIS
    Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list

At your convenience, visit:

    http://www.unicttf.org/mailman/admindb/startup

to approve or deny the request.

----- Message from "Gurstein, Michael" <gurstein at ADM.NJIT.EDU> on Tue, 18 
Apr 2006 07:22:15 -0400 -----
To:
<plenary at wsis-cs.org>
cc:
<gta at vancouvercommunity.net>, <startup at unicttaskforce.org>
Subject:
FW: [startup] Consultations on Action Line 11 of WSIS
Further to Renate's note of yesterday please see the below... 

I'm wondering if it might be possible, on behalf of the Plenary to reply 
to this "invitation" that a stakeholder "consultation" "to discuss ways to 
enhance collaboration among diverse stakeholders in ensuring effective 
multi-stakeholder implementation, at the international level, of the 
outcomes of WSIS as regards international and regional cooperation" held 
for 3 hours in a meeting room in Geneva is not a "consultation" but simply 
another means to perpetuate existing closed door exclusionary processes 
since only those already available in Geneva or with the requisite budgets 
to attend in Geneva for such a meeting will have an opportunity to 
participate.

Those without such resources who will, I assume, include most of those 
(including their representative organizations and "caucuses") with the 
most direct and immediate interest in "information exchange, creation of 
knowledge, sharing of best practices, and assistance in developing 
multi-stakeholder and policy/private (sic?) partnerships" as the sources 
and originators and ultimately end users of such knowledge will be 
excluded from participation.

MG

 -----Original Message-----
From: startup-bounces at unicttaskforce.org 
[mailto:startup-bounces at unicttaskforce.org] On Behalf Of sergei kambalov
Sent: April 18, 2006 12:23 AM
To: shoji.nishimoto at undp.org; Amir Dossal; Aida Opoku-Mensah; Joao Carlos 
FERRAZ; Mansour Farah; aw.khan at unesco.org; arthur.levin at itu.int; Georg 
Kell; richard.manning at oecd.org; walter.fust at deza.admin.ch; 
astrid.dufborg at sida.se; guy.sebban at iccwbo.org; amiller at itaa.org; 
rbloem at ngocongo.org; bruck at research.at; rrogers at giic.org; 
mfleeton at dgfoundation.org; grossda at state.gov; doris.bertrand at bmaa.gv.at; 
mission.tunisia at ties.itu.ch; mission.pakistan at ties.itu.ch; mb at hq.unu.edu; 
Marcel BOISARD; wendy.mann at fao.org; bridge at unicttaskforce.org; 
advisors at unicttaskforce.org; startup at unicttaskforce.org
Cc: Guido Bertucci; max-henri.cadet at itu.int; Makane Faye; Omar Bizri; 
Nikhil Chandavarkar; charles.geiger at itu.int; Haiyan Qian; 
Harry.De-Backer at cec.eu.int; Guennady Fedorov; michael.roeskau at cecd.org; 
Hans Hansell; masood.hatiif at gmail.com; Gerolf.Weigel at deza.admin.ch; 
john.dryden at oecd.org; raul.zambrano at undp.org; Patrizio Civili; 
david.benfield at fao.org; Denis Gilhooly; rinalia at gkps.org.my; 
radhika.lal at undp.org; Gherardo Casini; ayesha.hassan at iccwbo.org; 
smelhem at worldbank.org; Martin HILBERT; konstantinova at icnm.net
Subject: [startup] Consultations on Action Line 11 of WSIS

Dear colleagues, 

We are pleased to invite you to attend a first consultation that DESA, in 
its capacity of "provisional focal point" for facilitation of Action Line 
11 of the Geneva Plan of Action of the World Summit on the Information 
Society, will convene on 15 May 2005  in Salle XXV of the Palais de 
Nations, Geneva. The meeting will be open to all relevant stakeholders. 
The exact time of the meeting (most probably in the afternoon) will be 
communicated later. 
This meeting, convened in line with paragraph 108 of the Tunis Agenda for 
the Information Society, will provide an opportunity to discuss ways to 
enhance collaboration among diverse stakeholders in ensuring effective 
multi-stakeholder implementation, at the international level, of the 
outcomes of WSIS as regards international and regional cooperation. The 
other facilitators for this Action Line are the Regional Commissions, 
UNDP, ITU and UNESCO. 
As stated in paragraph 110 of the Tunis Agenda, "the cordination of 
multi-stakeholder implementation activities would help to avoid 
duplication of activities. This should ionclude. inter alia, information 
exchange, creation of knowledge, sharing of best practices, and assistance 
in developing multi-stakeholder and policy/private partnerships". We hope 
that at the forthcoming meeting, interested stakeholders will present 
their proposals on optimal modalities for this work, bearing in mind the 
specific  tasks under Action Line 11 (see paragraph 26 of the Geneva Plan 
of Action here: 
http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/03/wsis/doc/S03-WSIS-DOC-0005!!MSW-E.doc
). 
We look forward to a productive discussion. 
Best regards, 

S. Khan, Director, Office for Ecosoc Support and Coordination 
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations 
----- Message from startup-request at unicttaskforce.org on Unknown -----
Subject:
confirm ce8d7f9656fa40ed4d6a236d75d1d374df62f35b
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20060418/33fd0441/attachment.htm