[WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: [governance] Re: CS IGC IGF Statement

[Jacqueline Morris]

I have no problem with  people on the ground there making decisions, but
just to send a copy in advance would have been nice - takes 15 secs to email
from Geneva. Nothing in it I would have objected to.
Jacqueline

On 5/19/06, Veni Markovski <veni at veni.com> wrote:
>
> At 12:20 PM 19.5.2006 '?.'ЪЪ┬Ж  -0500, Jacqueline Morris wrote:
> >Hi
> >I do agree with David that the statement should
> >at least have been sent to the list before
> >reading out in the meeting. It did read in the
> >main as if it were an official IGC statement
>
> Well, I wasn't there, so I trusted Wolfgang's mail.
> But I still don't think we should be too hard on
> him. Sometimes there's no time for such mailings,
> and these people are there, and they can talk to
> each other - him, Milton, Bill, Karen, etc. and reach to consensus.
>
> veni
>
>


-- 
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20060519/e300ca8a/attachment.htm