AW: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] format for Tunis Summit

[Wolfgang Kleinwächter]

Thanks Vittorio for this new statement. I share the spirit of the statement and you should distribute this widely, not only to the (under-visited) ALAC discussion forum. 
 
With regard to ALAC/NCUC cooperation this is fine and can help to create some synergies but does not repair the generic defect. While I support the spirit of Part 3 of the ALAC statement to the Strategic Plan, I encourage you as the ALAC Chair to go beyond some vague and defensive observations and questions and put forward some clear language for revised ICANN bylaws. 
 
best
 
w
 

________________________________

Von: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von Vittorio Bertola
Gesendet: Di 01.03.2005 11:48
An: WSIS Plenary
Cc: bureau at wsis-cs.org; ct at wsis-cs.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] format for Tunis Summit



Il giorno mar, 01-03-2005 alle 11:26 +0100, Wolfgang Kleinwächter ha
scritto:
> Dear Vittorio,
> 
> it would be great if you could take this message back to the ALAC and to go forward with a proposal for a revision of the ALAC related articles of the ICANN bylaws.  You are the ALAC chair.

I'm not sure why we are having this discussion right on the WSIS
Plenary, Bureau and Content & Themes :-) (Though perhaps the IG Caucus
could give a thought in participating in the joint ALAC-NCUC thinking
exercises that we are trying to set up about the future of civil society
structures at ICANN.)

Anyway, you could for example have a look at the (draft, preliminary
etc) comment to the Strategic Plan that we just sent to ICANN:
http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00934.html

Ciao,
--
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...

_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary