[governance] Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Kofi Annan nominates IFG Advisory Group

Milton Mueller Mueller at syr.edu
Fri May 19 16:52:22 BST 2006


Bonjour Michel:

It is a fair question, but not so relevant now. I will indulge your desire for me to second-guess this specific list of names, if you agree to listen to me talk about the kind of process that the IGF should use in the future.

First and foremost, we need to avoid "patronage" systems of selection. It is unacceptable to let everyone lobby a "wise person" (UN SG) who makes political bargains that are not transparent and not accountable.

We need to separate commitments to fund the IGF from control over its composition. (Easier to say than to do, of course).

I think the MAG should be much smaller and considered to be much less important. We originally proposed 12-15 people. Delegates to the MAG should be considered representatives of broad stakeholder groups and NOT of their specific organizations or interests. 

For the CS slots, I believe the IGF Secretariat should have respected the formal and open civil society process organized around this caucus, and make the IGC recommendations the basis of all ten of its 10 CS selections. If it does not consider this caucus an acceptable mechanism, it should propose another one, perhaps regionally based. 

I think similar, globally representative and open mechanisms should be used to select Private Sector representatives. 

I think ICANN as an organization should have had at most one Board member represented, and there should be no staff member from ICANN. 

I think it is good that a ccTLD operator and a RIR operator are on there. I am happy that IETF and W3C are represented. I have always been an advocate of representation for the technical community. 

But there should also be someone additional from the human rights community, open source software community, privacy expert. 

I hope Babelfish serves you as well as it did me. 

>>> kohmichel at yahoo.fr 5/19/2006 8:33:41 AM >>>
Bonjour Milton,
   
  d'après toi, quelle aurait du être une répartition juste ? 
  Sur quels critères ?
   
  Michel Towa 

Milton Mueller <Mueller at syr.edu> a écrit :
  [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]

Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!
_______________________________________

Carlos:

>>> ca at rits.org.br 5/18/2006 5:11 PM >>>
>This is the distribution of the 45 members (not counting Nitin), as I

>see it:
>
>19 from governments
>10 from business
>09 from the Icann system (including ISOC)
>07 from civil society

Here is my perspective on the composition of the MAG:
http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/18/226205&mode=thread 
_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary at wsis-cs.org 
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary 


		
---------------------------------
 Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services préférés : vérifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualité en temps réel. Cliquez ici.




More information about the Plenary mailing list